News

Heirs Sue Met Museum Over Allegedly Stolen Van Gogh Artwork

The Met Museum is sued by heirs of a Jewish couple over a van Gogh painting allegedly looted by Nazis, raising issues of art restitution and ownership.

By Ashley Thompson3 min readOct 29, 20259 views
Share

cryptocurrency The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is facing a legal battle as the heirs of a Jewish couple claim that a Vincent van Gogh painting in the museum's collection was looted by the Nazis. This lawsuit sheds light on the complex history of art ownership during and after World War II.

The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, asserts that the painting, titled Olive Picking, was purchased by Hedwig and Frederick Stern in 1935. This acquisition came just a year before the Stern family was forced to flee their home in Munich due to Nazi persecution.

The heirs allege that the Met, which acquired the painting in 1956 for $125,000, should have been aware that the artwork was likely looted. The suit details how the painting has been “repeatedly and secretly trafficked, purchased and sold in and through New York” since the end of World War II.

According to the complaint, the Stern family, who emigrated to California with their six children in 1936, were unable to take their possessions, including the van Gogh painting, due to restrictions imposed by the Nazi regime. Before their departure, the Nazis designated the painting as “German cultural property,” thereby forbidding the Sterns from taking it abroad.

Heirs Sue Met Museum Over Allegedly Stolen Van Gogh Artwork Subsequently, a Nazi-appointed 'trustee' sold the painting in Germany on behalf of the Sterns but deposited the sale proceeds into a 'blocked account' that was later seized by the Nazis, as stated by the heirs' legal representatives.

After the war, the painting resurfaced in New York, likely around 1948, where it was purchased by Vincent Astor, one of the wealthiest individuals in America at the time. His wife, Brooke Astor, served on the board of trustees of the Metropolitan Museum from 1964 until 1983.

Trump Calls for US Nuclear Testing to Match Global Powers In 1972, the Met sold the painting to Greek shipping magnate Basil Goulandris and his wife, Elise. The Goulandris couple went on to establish the Basil & Elise Goulandris Foundation (BEG) in 1979, which now operates a museum in Athens where the painting is currently displayed.

The lawsuit names both the Goulandris Foundation and a surviving nephew of Basil Goulandris as defendants, claiming that they have concealed the painting's ownership and whereabouts. The suit emphasizes that the Goulandris defendants continue to obscure important facts regarding the painting's history, including the Stern family's ownership from 1935 to 1938 and the circumstances under which the painting was sold under Nazi coercion.

This is not the first time the Stern heirs have sought justice. In 2022, they filed a similar complaint in California, but it was dismissed in 2024, and an appeal was rejected in May. This current lawsuit not only aims to recover the painting but also seeks damages for the family's loss.

The lawsuit alleges that the Met's acquisition of the painting was approved by Theodore Rousseau Jr., the museum’s curator of European paintings, who is considered an authority in the field. The Met has not publicly commented on the lawsuit at this time.

This case highlights ongoing issues regarding the restitution of art looted during the Holocaust and raises questions about the responsibilities of museums in addressing their collections' histories. The Stern family's pursuit of the van Gogh painting reflects a broader struggle for justice and recognition of the losses endured during one of history's darkest periods.

Tags:

#US news#Vincent van Gogh#Nazism#New York#Museums

Related Posts